Difference between revisions of "PrA"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→Ellipse) |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
\end{alignat} | \end{alignat} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
− | One can establish a relationship between eccentricity and PrA by setting <math>b=1</math> and considering <math>a \in [1, \ | + | One can establish a relationship between eccentricity and PrA by setting <math>b=1</math> and considering <math>a \in [1, \infty]</math>: |
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | \mathrm{PRA} & \approx \frac{(a+1) }{ \sqrt{a} } \\ | ||
+ | e & = \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{a^2}} | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | So: |
Revision as of 16:05, 12 May 2022
PrA is a simple ad-hoc parameter to define the "non-circularity" or eccentricity of a 2D object. This quantity is simply:
Where is the object's perimeter, is its surface area, and is an effective size (radius), computed based on the corresponding circle of the same area:
This definition of PrA is convenient, since it provides a simple measure of eccentricity. In particular, for a circle one expects:
Since a circle has the minimal perimeter (for a given area), this is a limiting value of PrA:
And thus any non-circular object will have a larger PrA. An infinitely eccentric object would have .
Ellipse
If the object is an ellipse, with equation:
Then the width is and height (we assume ), the foci are for . The eccentricity is:
A circle has , while increasingly squashed ellipses have values of closer and closer to . The area of an ellipse is:
The perimeter is not analytic but can be approximated very roughly by:
Which yields:
One can establish a relationship between eccentricity and PrA by setting and considering :
So: