Difference between revisions of "PrA"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Then the width is <math>2a</math> and height <math>2b</math> (we assume <math>a \ge b</math>), the foci are <math>(\pm c, 0)</math> for <math display="inline">c = \sqrt{a^2-b^2}</math>. The eccentricity is: | Then the width is <math>2a</math> and height <math>2b</math> (we assume <math>a \ge b</math>), the foci are <math>(\pm c, 0)</math> for <math display="inline">c = \sqrt{a^2-b^2}</math>. The eccentricity is: | ||
: <math>e = \frac{c}{a} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{b^2}{a^2}}</math> | : <math>e = \frac{c}{a} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{b^2}{a^2}}</math> | ||
− | The area is: | + | A circle has <math>e=0</math>, while increasingly squashed ellipses have values of <math>e</math> closer and closer to <math>1</math>. The area of an ellipse is: |
: <math>A = \pi a b</math> | : <math>A = \pi a b</math> | ||
The perimeter is not analytic but can be approximated very roughly by: | The perimeter is not analytic but can be approximated very roughly by: | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
& \approx \frac{(a+b) }{ a b} \sqrt{a b} \\ | & \approx \frac{(a+b) }{ a b} \sqrt{a b} \\ | ||
& \approx \frac{(a+b) }{ \sqrt{a b} } \\ | & \approx \frac{(a+b) }{ \sqrt{a b} } \\ | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | One can establish a relationship between eccentricity and PrA by setting <math>b=1</math> and considering <math>a \in [1, \infty]</math>: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | \mathrm{PRA} & \approx \frac{(a+1) }{ \sqrt{a} } \\ | ||
+ | e & = \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{a^2}} | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | In particular: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | \frac{(a+1) }{ \sqrt{a} } & = \mathrm{PRA} \\ | ||
+ | (a+1)^2 & = \mathrm{PRA}^2 a \\ | ||
+ | a^2+2a+1- \mathrm{PRA}^2 a & = 0 \\ | ||
+ | (1)a^2+(2-\mathrm{PRA}^2 )a+(1) & = 0 \\ | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | From the quadratic equation: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | a & = \frac{-(2-\mathrm{PRA}^2)\pm \sqrt{(2-\mathrm{PRA}^2)^2 - 4(1)(1)} }{2(1)} \\ | ||
+ | & = \frac{1}{2} \left( -2+\mathrm{PRA}^2\pm \sqrt{(2-\mathrm{PRA}^2)^2 - 4} \right)\\ | ||
+ | & = \frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 \pm \sqrt{(2-\mathrm{PRA}^2)^2 - 4} \right)\\ | ||
+ | & = \frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 \pm \sqrt{4 -4\mathrm{PRA}^2 + \mathrm{PRA}^4 - 4} \right)\\ | ||
+ | & = \frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 \pm \sqrt{\mathrm{PRA}^4 - 4\mathrm{PRA}^2} \right)\\ | ||
+ | & = \frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 \pm \mathrm{PRA} \sqrt{\mathrm{PRA}^2 - 4} \right)\\ | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | Since <math>a \to \infty</math> as <math>P \to \infty</math>, we select the positive branch. | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | a & = \frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 + \mathrm{PRA} \sqrt{\mathrm{PRA}^2 - 4} \right)\\ | ||
+ | a^2 & = \frac{1}{4} \left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 + \mathrm{PRA} \sqrt{\mathrm{PRA}^2 - 4} \right)^2\\ | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | And so: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | e & = \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{a^2}} \\ | ||
+ | & = \sqrt{1 - \frac{4}{\left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 + \mathrm{PRA} \sqrt{\mathrm{PRA}^2 - 4} \right)^2}} \\ | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | We can convert into a width:height ratio (<math>a/b</math>) as: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | \frac{a}{b} & = \sqrt{1 - e^2} \\ | ||
+ | & = \frac{1}{2} \left( \mathrm{PRA}^2-2 + \mathrm{PRA} \sqrt{\mathrm{PRA}^2 - 4} \right)\\ | ||
\end{alignat} | \end{alignat} | ||
</math> | </math> |
Latest revision as of 09:55, 31 May 2022
PrA is a simple ad-hoc parameter to define the "non-circularity" or eccentricity of a 2D object. This quantity is simply:
Where is the object's perimeter, is its surface area, and is an effective size (radius), computed based on the corresponding circle of the same area:
This definition of PrA is convenient, since it provides a simple measure of eccentricity. In particular, for a circle one expects:
Since a circle has the minimal perimeter (for a given area), this is a limiting value of PrA:
And thus any non-circular object will have a larger PrA. An infinitely eccentric object would have .
Ellipse
If the object is an ellipse, with equation:
Then the width is and height (we assume ), the foci are for . The eccentricity is:
A circle has , while increasingly squashed ellipses have values of closer and closer to . The area of an ellipse is:
The perimeter is not analytic but can be approximated very roughly by:
Which yields:
One can establish a relationship between eccentricity and PrA by setting and considering :
In particular:
From the quadratic equation:
Since as , we select the positive branch.
And so:
We can convert into a width:height ratio () as: