Difference between revisions of "Guinier plot"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→Rule of thumb) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Rule of thumb== | ==Rule of thumb== | ||
+ | The larger one's particles are, the smaller the minimum ''[[q]]'' must be. One also only expects the Guinier scaling to be maintained up to a certain maximum ''q'': | ||
* For spherical particles, <math>\scriptstyle q_{\mathrm{max}} < 1.3 R_g </math> | * For spherical particles, <math>\scriptstyle q_{\mathrm{max}} < 1.3 R_g </math> | ||
* For elongated particles, <math>\scriptstyle q_{\mathrm{max}} < 0.8 R_g </math> | * For elongated particles, <math>\scriptstyle q_{\mathrm{max}} < 0.8 R_g </math> |
Revision as of 08:41, 25 July 2015
A Guinier analysis attempts to extract the size-scale for a structure by fitting the scattering to an equation of the form:
Thus a plot of ln(I) vs. q2 can be used to highly the scaling of the scattering. A straight-line in such a plot is indicative of Guinier scaling. Such an analysis is typically only done with the low-q portion of the data.
Rule of thumb
The larger one's particles are, the smaller the minimum q must be. One also only expects the Guinier scaling to be maintained up to a certain maximum q:
- For spherical particles,
- For elongated particles,
See Also
- P. Thiyagarajan, T. S. Burkoth, V. Urban, S. Seifert, T. L. S. Benzinger, D. M. Morgan, D. Gordon, S. C. Meredith and D. G. Lynn pH dependent self assembly of beta-amyloid(10-35) and beta-amyloid(10-35)-PEG3000 J. Appl. Cryst. 2000, 33, 535-539. doi: 10.1107/S0021889899014387
- A. V. Smirnov, I. N. Deryabin and B. A. Fedorov Small-angle scattering: the Guinier technique underestimates the size of hard globular particles due to the structure-factor effect J. Appl. Cryst. 2015, 48. doi: 10.1107/S160057671501078X