Difference between revisions of "In-situ"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''In-situ''' measurements are those where the sample-of-interest is studied in a scientifically-relevant environment (as opposed to an artificial environment convenient for t...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2015
In-situ measurements are those where the sample-of-interest is studied in a scientifically-relevant environment (as opposed to an artificial environment convenient for the instrument; e.g. vacuum). Thus, proteins studied in their native liquid environment, or polymer films studied during thermal processing, are examples of in-situ.
Because x-rays and neutrons are strongly penetrating, scattering experiments are well-suited to being performed in-situ (this is one of the key advantages of scattering). Thus, materials can be probed under realistic 'native' conditions, or during relevant processing/transformation conditions. One can also define in-operando, wherein materials are studied during operation (e.g. a battery studied during charging/discharging). More abstractly, one can consider in-situ the study of materials under prescribed equilibrium conditions, whereas in-operando is the study during prescribed non-equilibrium (e.g. time-varying) conditions.
Examples
- Environment
- Solvent
- Water
- Control ionic strength, pH, concentration, etc.
- Water
- Vapor
- Humidity
- Solvent exposure (solvent annealing)
- Solvent
- Thermal
- Heating/annealing
- Cooling
- Thermal cycling
- Thermal gradients
- Mechanical force
- Pressure (c.f. diamond anvil cell)
- Stretching
- Shear
- Applied fields
- Electric
- Magnetic
- Irradiation
- Visible light, IR, UV, etc.
Literature
- Vanessa K. Peterson and Christine M. Papadakis Functional materials analysis using in situ and in operando X-ray and neutron scattering IUCrJ 2015, 2 (2). doi: 10.1107/S2052252514026062