Difference between revisions of "AI in education"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→AI in Education) |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→Survey/study of) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Survey/study of== | ==Survey/study of== | ||
* 2023-08: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-38964-3 Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses] | * 2023-08: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-38964-3 Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses] | ||
| + | * 2023-10: [https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20231017-the-employees-secretly-using-ai-at-work Employees] secretly using AI at work. | ||
| + | * 2023-10: [https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2023/10/31/most-students-outrunning-faculty-ai-use?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&utm_campaign=23419446b9-DNU_2021_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-23419446b9-236889242&mc_cid=23419446b9&mc_eid=dae49d931a Survey] shows students using AI more than professors. | ||
==AI improves learning/education== | ==AI improves learning/education== | ||
Revision as of 09:26, 14 October 2024
Contents
AI in Education
Survey/study of
- 2023-08: Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses
- 2023-10: Employees secretly using AI at work.
- 2023-10: Survey shows students using AI more than professors.
AI improves learning/education
- Mollick, Ethan R. and Mollick, Lilach and Bach, Natalie and Ciccarelli, LJ and Przystanski, Ben and Ravipinto, Daniel, AI Agents and Education: Simulated Practice at Scale (June 17, 2024). The Wharton School Research Paper. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4871171
- Can enable personalized education.
- Generative AI for Programming Education: Benchmarking ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Human Tutors
- GPT4 can out-perform human tutors.
AI harms learning
- A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system: A “Turing Test” case study ** Current grading systems cannot detect AI.
- Bastani, Hamsa and Bastani, Osbert and Sungu, Alp and Ge, Haosen and Kabakcı, Özge and Mariman, Rei, Generative AI Can Harm Learning (July 15, 2024). The Wharton School Research Paper.doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4895486
- Access to ChatGPT harmed math education outcomes.
Software/systems
AI/human
AI out-performs humans
Tests
- 2024-06: A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system: A “Turing Test” case study
- AI scores higher than median students.
Creativity
- 2023-09: Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task
- Best humans out-perform AI at creativity. (By implication, median humans may not.)
- 2024-02: The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks
- 2024-02: Felin, Teppo and Holweg, Matthias, Theory Is All You Need: AI, Human Cognition, and Causal Reasoning (February 24, 2024). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4737265
- Argues that human "theory-based" creativity is better than AI "data-based".
- 2024-07: Pron vs Prompt: Can Large Language Models already Challenge a World-Class Fiction Author at Creative Text Writing?
- Top human (professional author) out-performs GPT4.
- 2024-09: Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers
- LLMs can be creative
Professions
- 2024-03: Influence of a Large Language Model on Diagnostic Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Vignette Study
- GPT4 improves medical practitioner work; surprisingly, GPT4 alone scored better than a human with GPT4 as aid (on selected tasks).
AI improves human work
- TBD
Uptake
TBD
