Difference between revisions of "Refraction distortion"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (Created page with "In GISAXS, GIWAXS, and other grazing-incidence techniques, the refractive index difference between the film and the ambient causes the incident and scattering|sc...") |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In [[GISAXS]], [[GIWAXS]], and other grazing-incidence techniques, the [[refractive index]] difference between the film and the ambient causes the incident and [[scattering|scattered]] [[x-ray]] beams to be refracted. This extent of refraction depends on the incident and exit angles. Thus, the data that appears on an area [[detector]] in a grazing-incidence experiment is non-linearly distorted. This makes data interpretation more problematic. | + | In [[GISAXS]], [[GIWAXS]], and other grazing-incidence techniques, the [[refractive index]] difference between the film and the ambient causes the incident and [[scattering|scattered]] [[x-ray]] beams to be refracted. This extent of refraction depends on the incident and exit angles. Thus, the data that appears on an area [[detector]] in a grazing-incidence experiment is non-linearly distorted. This makes [[Tutorial:What_to_do_with_data|data interpretation]] more problematic. |
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [[DWBA]] | * [[DWBA]] | ||
* TBD | * TBD | ||
Revision as of 13:44, 12 January 2015
In GISAXS, GIWAXS, and other grazing-incidence techniques, the refractive index difference between the film and the ambient causes the incident and scattered x-ray beams to be refracted. This extent of refraction depends on the incident and exit angles. Thus, the data that appears on an area detector in a grazing-incidence experiment is non-linearly distorted. This makes data interpretation more problematic.
See Also
- DWBA
- TBD
