Difference between revisions of "Refraction distortion"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→See Also) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [[DWBA]] | * [[DWBA]] | ||
| − | * | + | * D. W. Breiby, O. Bunk, J. W. Andreasen, H. T. Lemke and M. M. Nielsen [http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889808001064 Simulating X-ray diffraction of textured films] ''J. Appl. Cryst.'' '''2008''', 41, 262-271. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889808001064 doi: 10.1107/S0021889808001064] |
| + | * P. Busch, M. Rauscher, D.-M. Smilgies, D. Posselt and C. M. Papadakis [http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889806012337 Grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering from thin polymer films with lamellar structures - the scattering cross section in the distorted-wave Born approximation] ''J. Appl. Cryst.'' '''2006''', 39, 433-442. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889806012337 doi: 10.1107/S0021889806012337] | ||
Revision as of 13:48, 12 January 2015
In GISAXS, GIWAXS, and other grazing-incidence techniques, the refractive index difference between the film and the ambient causes the incident and scattered x-ray beams to be refracted. This extent of refraction depends on the incident and exit angles. Thus, the data that appears on an area detector in a grazing-incidence experiment is non-linearly distorted. This makes data interpretation more problematic.
See Also
- DWBA
- D. W. Breiby, O. Bunk, J. W. Andreasen, H. T. Lemke and M. M. Nielsen Simulating X-ray diffraction of textured films J. Appl. Cryst. 2008, 41, 262-271. doi: 10.1107/S0021889808001064
- P. Busch, M. Rauscher, D.-M. Smilgies, D. Posselt and C. M. Papadakis Grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering from thin polymer films with lamellar structures - the scattering cross section in the distorted-wave Born approximation J. Appl. Cryst. 2006, 39, 433-442. doi: 10.1107/S0021889806012337
