Difference between revisions of "AI compute"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→Energy Use) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* [https://hyperbolic.xyz/ Hyperbolic AI] (open models, Enterprise tier) | * [https://hyperbolic.xyz/ Hyperbolic AI] (open models, Enterprise tier) | ||
* Huggingface [https://huggingface.co/blog/inference-providers Inference Providers Hub] | * Huggingface [https://huggingface.co/blog/inference-providers Inference Providers Hub] | ||
| + | * [https://www.asksage.ai/ AskSage] | ||
==Multi-model with Model Selection== | ==Multi-model with Model Selection== | ||
| Line 60: | Line 61: | ||
* 2024-02: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans] | * 2024-02: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54271-x The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans] | ||
* 2025-04: [https://andymasley.substack.com/p/a-cheat-sheet-for-conversations-about Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet] | * 2025-04: [https://andymasley.substack.com/p/a-cheat-sheet-for-conversations-about Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet] | ||
| + | ** A single LLM response uses only ~3 Wh = 11 kJ (~10 Google searches; [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pDdpPq3MyPdEAoTkho9YABZ0NBEhBH2v4EA98fm3pXQ/edit?usp=sharing examples of 3 Wh energy usage]) | ||
| + | ** Reading an LLM-generated response (computer running for a few minutes) typically uses more energy than the LLM generation of the text. | ||
| + | * 2025-07: Mistral: [https://mistral.ai/news/our-contribution-to-a-global-environmental-standard-for-ai Our contribution to a global environmental standard for AI] | ||
| + | * 2025-08: [https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/measuring_the_environmental_impact_of_delivering_ai_at_google_scale.pdf Measuring the environmental impact of delivering AI at Google Scale] ([https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/measuring-the-environmental-impact-of-ai-inference blog]) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:34, 21 August 2025
Contents
Cloud GPU
Cloud Training Compute
Cloud LLM Routers & Inference Providers
- OpenRouter (open and closed models, no Enterprise tier)
- LiteLLM (closed models, Enterprise tier)
- Cent ML (open models, Enterprise tier)
- Fireworks AI (open models, Enterprise tier)
- Abacus AI (open and closed models, Enterprise tier)
- Portkey (open? and closed models, Enterprise tier)
- Together AI (open models, Enterprise tier)
- Hyperbolic AI (open models, Enterprise tier)
- Huggingface Inference Providers Hub
- AskSage
Multi-model with Model Selection
Multi-model Web Chat Interfaces
Multi-model Web Playground Interfaces
Local Router
Acceleration Hardware
- Nvidia GPUs
- Google TPU
- Etched: Transformer ASICs
- Cerebras
- Untether AI
- Graphcore
- SambaNova Systems
- Groq
- Tesla Dojo
- Deep Silicon: Combined hardware/software solution for accelerated AI (e.g. ternary math)
Energy Use
- 2021-04: Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training
- 2023-10: From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inference
- 2024-01: Electricity 2024: Analysis and forecast to 2026
- 2024-02: The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans
- 2025-04: Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet
- A single LLM response uses only ~3 Wh = 11 kJ (~10 Google searches; examples of 3 Wh energy usage)
- Reading an LLM-generated response (computer running for a few minutes) typically uses more energy than the LLM generation of the text.
- 2025-07: Mistral: Our contribution to a global environmental standard for AI
- 2025-08: Measuring the environmental impact of delivering AI at Google Scale (blog)
