Difference between revisions of "AI and Humans"

From GISAXS
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎AI improves human work)
(→‎AI improves human work)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 168: Line 168:
 
** 2025-03: Ethan Mollick: [https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/the-cybernetic-teammateThe Cybernetic Teammate]: Having an AI on your team can increase performance, provide expertise, and improve your experience
 
** 2025-03: Ethan Mollick: [https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/the-cybernetic-teammateThe Cybernetic Teammate]: Having an AI on your team can increase performance, provide expertise, and improve your experience
 
* 2025-09: [https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/vbkmt_v1 Quantifying Human-AI Synergy]
 
* 2025-09: [https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/vbkmt_v1 Quantifying Human-AI Synergy]
 +
* 2025-10: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12049 Generative AI and Firm Productivity: Field Experiments in Online Retail]
 +
* 2025-10: Wharton: [https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/special-report/2025-ai-adoption-report/ 2025 AI Adoption Report] (75% report positive ROI)
  
 
===Coding===
 
===Coding===
Line 173: Line 175:
 
* 2024-09:  Cui, Zheyuan and Demirer, Mert and Jaffe, Sonia and Musolff, Leon and Peng, Sida and Salz, Tobias, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4945566 The Effects of Generative AI on High Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers] (September 03, 2024). [http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4945566 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4945566 ]
 
* 2024-09:  Cui, Zheyuan and Demirer, Mert and Jaffe, Sonia and Musolff, Leon and Peng, Sida and Salz, Tobias, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4945566 The Effects of Generative AI on High Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers] (September 03, 2024). [http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4945566 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4945566 ]
 
* 2024-11:  Hoffmann, Manuel and Boysel, Sam and Nagle, Frank and Peng, Sida and Xu, Kevin, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5007084 Generative AI and the Nature of Work] (October 27, 2024). Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 25-021, Harvard Business Working Paper No. No. 25-021, [http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5007084 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5007084]
 
* 2024-11:  Hoffmann, Manuel and Boysel, Sam and Nagle, Frank and Peng, Sida and Xu, Kevin, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5007084 Generative AI and the Nature of Work] (October 27, 2024). Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 25-021, Harvard Business Working Paper No. No. 25-021, [http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5007084 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5007084]
 +
* 2025-09: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19708 Intuition to Evidence: Measuring AI's True Impact on Developer Productivity]
  
 
===Forecasting===
 
===Forecasting===
Line 200: Line 203:
 
===Creativity===
 
===Creativity===
 
* See also: [[AI creativity]]
 
* See also: [[AI creativity]]
 +
* 2024-02: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01727 Prompting Diverse Ideas: Increasing AI Idea Variance]
 
* 2024-07: [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290 Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content]
 
* 2024-07: [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290 Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content]
 
* 2024-08: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01953-1 An empirical investigation of the impact of ChatGPT on creativity]
 
* 2024-08: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01953-1 An empirical investigation of the impact of ChatGPT on creativity]
Line 210: Line 214:
 
* 2024-12: [https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2440691 Using AI to Generate Visual Art: Do Individual Differences in Creativity Predict AI-Assisted Art Quality?] ([https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ygzw6 preprint]): shows that more creative humans produce more creative genAI outputs
 
* 2024-12: [https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2440691 Using AI to Generate Visual Art: Do Individual Differences in Creativity Predict AI-Assisted Art Quality?] ([https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ygzw6 preprint]): shows that more creative humans produce more creative genAI outputs
 
* 2025-01: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11433 One Does Not Simply Meme Alone: Evaluating Co-Creativity Between LLMs and Humans in the Generation of Humor]
 
* 2025-01: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11433 One Does Not Simply Meme Alone: Evaluating Co-Creativity Between LLMs and Humans in the Generation of Humor]
 +
* 2025-05: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17241 Generative AI and Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis]
  
 
===Equity===
 
===Equity===
Line 239: Line 244:
 
* 2024-11: [https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/how-did-you-do-on-the-ai-art-turing How Did You Do On The AI Art Turing Test?] Differentiation was only slightly above random (60%). AI art was often ranked higher than human-made.
 
* 2024-11: [https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/how-did-you-do-on-the-ai-art-turing How Did You Do On The AI Art Turing Test?] Differentiation was only slightly above random (60%). AI art was often ranked higher than human-made.
 
* 2024-11: [https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76900-1 AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably]
 
* 2024-11: [https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76900-1 AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably]
 +
* 2025-09: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25601 Echoes of Humanity: Exploring the Perceived Humanness of AI Music]
  
 
=Uptake=
 
=Uptake=
Line 285: Line 291:
 
==Human Sentiment towards AI==
 
==Human Sentiment towards AI==
 
* 2025-04: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/ How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence]
 
* 2025-04: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/ How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence]
 +
* 2025-10: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/10/15/how-people-around-the-world-view-ai/ How People Around the World View AI: More are concerned than excited about its use, and more trust their own country and the EU to regulate it than trust the U.S. or China]
  
 
==AI Persuasion of Humans==
 
==AI Persuasion of Humans==
Line 333: Line 340:
 
==Theory of Mind==
 
==Theory of Mind==
 
* 2025-08: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s44387-025-00031-9 How large language models encode theory-of-mind: a study on sparse parameter patterns]
 
* 2025-08: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s44387-025-00031-9 How large language models encode theory-of-mind: a study on sparse parameter patterns]
 +
* 2025-10: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22887 Infusing Theory of Mind into Socially Intelligent LLM Agents]
  
 
==Humanlike Vibes==
 
==Humanlike Vibes==
 
* 2025-07: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20525 The Xeno Sutra: Can Meaning and Value be Ascribed to an AI-Generated "Sacred" Text?]
 
* 2025-07: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20525 The Xeno Sutra: Can Meaning and Value be Ascribed to an AI-Generated "Sacred" Text?]
 +
* 2025-10: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08338 LLMs Reproduce Human Purchase Intent via Semantic Similarity Elicitation of Likert Ratings]
  
 
==Skeptical==
 
==Skeptical==

Latest revision as of 12:21, 28 October 2025

AI in Education

Survey/study of

AI improves learning/education

AI harms learning

Software/systems

LLMs

Individual tools

Systems

AI for grading

Detection

AI Text Detectors Don't Work

AI/human

Capabilities

Writing

AI out-performs humans

Tests

Creativity

Art

Business & Marketing

Professions

  • Humanity's Last Exam
    • Effort to build a dataset of challenging (but resolvable) questions in specific domain areas, to act as a benchmark to test whether AIs are improving in these challenging topics.

Coding

Medical

Bio

Therapy

Financial

HR

AI improves human work

Coding

Forecasting

Finance

Law

Medical

Translation

Customer service

  • 2023-11: Generative AI at Work: Improvements for workers and clients (though also a ceiling to improvement)

Creativity

Equity

AI worse than humans

AI lowers human productivity

Human Perceptions of AI

AI passes Turing Test

Text Dialog

Art

Uptake

Usage For

Hiding Usage

Societal Effects/Transformations

Psychological Impact

Human Sentiment towards AI

AI Persuasion of Humans

(AI can update beliefs, change opinions, tackle conspiracy theories, etc.)

AI Effects on Human Psychology

Human well-being

Counter loneliness

Human mental abilities (creativity, learning)

Simulate Humans

Sociology

Theory of Mind

Humanlike Vibes

Skeptical

See Also

Retrieved from "http://gisaxs.com/index.php?title=AI_and_Humans&oldid=8347"