Difference between revisions of "AI and Humans"

From GISAXS
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎AI improves human work)
(→‎Uptake)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 272: Line 272:
 
* 2025-07: METR: [https://epochai.substack.com/p/after-the-chatgpt-moment-measuring After the ChatGPT Moment: Measuring AI’s Adoption How quickly has AI been diffusing through the economy?]
 
* 2025-07: METR: [https://epochai.substack.com/p/after-the-chatgpt-moment-measuring After the ChatGPT Moment: Measuring AI’s Adoption How quickly has AI been diffusing through the economy?]
 
* 2025-07: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/06/25/34-of-us-adults-have-used-chatgpt-about-double-the-share-in-2023/ 34% of U.S. adults have used ChatGPT, about double the share in 2023]
 
* 2025-07: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/06/25/34-of-us-adults-have-used-chatgpt-about-double-the-share-in-2023/ 34% of U.S. adults have used ChatGPT, about double the share in 2023]
 +
* 2025-12: Epoch AI: [https://epoch.ai/data/polling Polling on AI Usage]
  
 
==Usage For==
 
==Usage For==
Line 288: Line 289:
 
=Psychological Impact=
 
=Psychological Impact=
 
* 2025-08: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16628 The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Thought]
 
* 2025-08: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16628 The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Thought]
 +
* 2025-11: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15352 People readily follow personal advice from AI but it does not improve their well-being]
  
 
==Human Sentiment towards AI==
 
==Human Sentiment towards AI==
 
* 2025-04: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/ How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence]
 
* 2025-04: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/ How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence]
 
* 2025-10: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/10/15/how-people-around-the-world-view-ai/ How People Around the World View AI: More are concerned than excited about its use, and more trust their own country and the EU to regulate it than trust the U.S. or China]
 
* 2025-10: Pew Research: [https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/10/15/how-people-around-the-world-view-ai/ How People Around the World View AI: More are concerned than excited about its use, and more trust their own country and the EU to regulate it than trust the U.S. or China]
 +
* 2025-12: [https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2025-11/2025%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Flash%20Poll%20Trust%20and%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20at%20a%20Crossroads%201.pdf 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer]
  
 
==AI Persuasion of Humans==
 
==AI Persuasion of Humans==
Line 304: Line 307:
 
* 2025-05: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09662 Large Language Models Are More Persuasive Than Incentivized Human Persuaders]
 
* 2025-05: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09662 Large Language Models Are More Persuasive Than Incentivized Human Persuaders]
 
* 2025-07: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13919 The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AI]
 
* 2025-07: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13919 The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AI]
 +
* 2025-12: [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aea3884 The levers of political persuasion with conversational artificial intelligence]
 +
* 2025-12: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09771-9 Persuading voters using human–artificial intelligence dialogues]
  
 
==AI Effects on Human Psychology==
 
==AI Effects on Human Psychology==
Line 337: Line 342:
 
* 2025-07: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15815 LLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacra]
 
* 2025-07: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15815 LLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacra]
 
* 2025-09: [https://benjaminmanning.io/files/optimize.pdf General Social Agents]
 
* 2025-09: [https://benjaminmanning.io/files/optimize.pdf General Social Agents]
 +
* 2025-12: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06958 Simulating Society Requires Simulating Thought]
  
 
==Theory of Mind==
 
==Theory of Mind==

Latest revision as of 17:21, 20 December 2025

AI in Education

Survey/study of

AI improves learning/education

AI harms learning

Software/systems

LLMs

Individual tools

Systems

AI for grading

Detection

AI Text Detectors Don't Work

AI/human

Capabilities

Writing

AI out-performs humans

Tests

Creativity

Art

Business & Marketing

Professions

  • Humanity's Last Exam
    • Effort to build a dataset of challenging (but resolvable) questions in specific domain areas, to act as a benchmark to test whether AIs are improving in these challenging topics.

Coding

Medical

Bio

Therapy

Financial

HR

AI improves human work

Coding

Forecasting

Finance

Law

Medical

Translation

Customer service

  • 2023-11: Generative AI at Work: Improvements for workers and clients (though also a ceiling to improvement)

Creativity

Equity

AI worse than humans

AI lowers human productivity

Human Perceptions of AI

AI passes Turing Test

Text Dialog

Art

Uptake

Usage For

Hiding Usage

Societal Effects/Transformations

Psychological Impact

Human Sentiment towards AI

AI Persuasion of Humans

(AI can update beliefs, change opinions, tackle conspiracy theories, etc.)

AI Effects on Human Psychology

Human well-being

Counter loneliness

Human mental abilities (creativity, learning)

Simulate Humans

Sociology

Theory of Mind

Humanlike Vibes

Skeptical

See Also

Retrieved from "http://gisaxs.com/index.php?title=AI_and_Humans&oldid=8481"