Difference between revisions of "Increasing AI Intelligence"

From GISAXS
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Chain-of-Thought Reasoning)
(→‎Proactive Search)
 
Line 22: Line 22:
 
* 2024-09: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17115 Programming Every Example: Lifting Pre-training Data Quality like Experts at Scale]
 
* 2024-09: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17115 Programming Every Example: Lifting Pre-training Data Quality like Experts at Scale]
 
* 2024-10: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15547 Data Cleaning Using Large Language Models]
 
* 2024-10: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15547 Data Cleaning Using Large Language Models]
 +
* 2025-01: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18845 Text Data Augmentation for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities]
 
* Updating list of links: [https://github.com/wasiahmad/Awesome-LLM-Synthetic-Data Synthetic Data of LLMs, by LLMs, for LLMs]
 
* Updating list of links: [https://github.com/wasiahmad/Awesome-LLM-Synthetic-Data Synthetic Data of LLMs, by LLMs, for LLMs]
  

Latest revision as of 11:26, 3 February 2025

Reviews

Prompt Engineering

Fine Tuning

Proactive Search

Compute expended after training, but before inference.

Training Data (Data Refinement, Synthetic Data)

Generate consistent plans/thoughts

  • 2024-08: Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solvers (code)
    • (Microsoft) rStar is a self-play mutual reasoning approach. A small model adds to MCTS using some defined reasoning heuristics. Mutually consistent trajectories can be emphasized.
  • 2024-09: Self-Harmonized Chain of Thought
    • Produce refined chain-of-thought style solutions/prompts for diverse problems. Given a large set of problems/questions, first aggregated semantically, then apply zero-shot chain-of-thought to each problem. Then cross-pollinate between proposed solutions to similar problems, looking for refined and generalize solutions.
  • 2024-11: LLMs Do Not Think Step-by-step In Implicit Reasoning
    • They argue that models trained to reproduce CoT outputs do not, internally, perform stepwise reasoning (with intermediate representations); this suggests that explicit CoT could be superior to implicit CoT.

Sampling

Automated prompt generation

Distill inference-time-compute into model

CoT reasoning model

See also: AI tools > LLM > Open-weights LLM > Reasoning

Scaling

Inference Time Compute

Methods

Review

In context learning (ICL), search, and other inference-time methods

Inference-time Sampling

Inference-time Gradient

Self-prompting

Retrieval or Memory

In-context thought

Naive multi-LLM (verification, majority voting, best-of-N, etc.)

Multi-LLM (multiple comparisons, branching, etc.)

Iteration (e.g. neural-like layered blocks)

Iterative reasoning via graphs

Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)

Other Search

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Analysis

Scaling

Theory

Expending compute works

Compute.png

Pitfalls

Pragmatics

Code for Inference-time Compute

  • optillm: Inference proxy which implements state-of-the-art techniques to improve accuracy and performance of LLMs (improve reasoning over coding, logical and mathematical queries)

Interact with Environment

Memory

Tool Use

Integrated

Multi-agent Effort (and Emergent Intelligence)

ML-like Optimization of LLM Setup

Limitations/Requirements

Creativity

See Also

Retrieved from "http://gisaxs.com/index.php?title=Increasing_AI_Intelligence&oldid=6800"