Difference between revisions of "Quantum Mechanics"
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→Expectation value) |
KevinYager (talk | contribs) (→Expectation value) |
||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
| <math> \langle A \rangle_{\psi} = \langle \psi | \hat{A} | \psi \rangle </math> | | <math> \langle A \rangle_{\psi} = \langle \psi | \hat{A} | \psi \rangle </math> | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | If the system is in an eigenstate of the operator: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | \psi = \sum_n c_n \psi_n = \psi_n | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | We know that: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \hat{A} \psi_n = a_n \psi_n | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | And so: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{alignat}{2} | ||
+ | \langle A \rangle & = \int \psi_n^* \hat{A} \psi_n \mathrm{d}x \\ | ||
+ | & = \int \psi^* a_n \psi \mathrm{d}x \\ | ||
+ | & = a_n \int \psi^* \psi \mathrm{d}x \\ | ||
+ | & = a_n \\ | ||
+ | \end{alignat} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | In other words, the expectation value of an eigenstate is simply the eigenvalue. | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics Wikipedia: Quantum Mechanics] | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics Wikipedia: Quantum Mechanics] |
Revision as of 20:21, 12 October 2014
Quantum mechanics is a theory that describes the interactions of all particles and systems. It underlies all physical phenomena, including scattering.
Contents
Wavefunction
A quantum system is completely specified by its Wave Function:
Integral Notation | Dirac Notation |
---|---|
The wavefunction is typically normalized:
Integral Notation | Dirac Notation |
---|---|
The distribution of the particle described by is given by:
Integral Notation | Dirac Notation |
---|---|
In the Copenhagen Interpretation, is the probability of finding the particle at location . In Universal Wave Function interpretations (e.g. MWI), can be thought of as the spatial distribution of the particle. The wavefunction contains all the information one can know about a system. It can thus be thought of as 'being' the particle/system in question. However, the wavefunction can be described in an infinite number of different ways. That is, there is not a unique basis for describing the wavefunction. So, for instance, one can describe the wavefunction using position-space or momentum-space:
These representations can be inter-related (c.f. Fourier transform):
State
Note that the wavefunction describes the state of the system; there are various choices of basis one can use as an expansion.
An operator defines a particular convenient basis: one can always expand using the basis defined by an operator, in which case the above are the eigenvectors (or eigenstates) of that basis. This can also be viewed as a vector in the Hilbert space. The Dirac notation (bra-ket notation) is useful in this regard. A particular state is a (column) vector:
Which is a 'ket'. We define a 'bra' (the 'final state') as a (row) vector:
And note that the 'bra' is the conjuagte transpose of the 'ket':
Wave packet
TBD
Heisenberg Indeterminacy Relations
(Also known as Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.)
Superposition
If and are both allowed states for a given system, then the following state is also allowed:
This leads to a notable consequence:
Notice that the final terms represent 'interference' between the two constituent states. This interference has no classical analogue; it is a quantum effect. Thus a superposition is not merely a 'joining' of the two states (e.g. "the particle can be in state 1 or state 2"), but a truly coherent interference between the two states. The superposition may be more generally written as:
Integral Notation | Dirac Notation |
---|---|
The distribution of the particle described by is given by:
Integral Notation | Dirac Notation |
---|---|
Operators
Observables in QM appears as operators ().
Examples: TBD.
Measurement
The transition of the wavefunction into state can be thought of as:
When acting on a wavefunction with operator the probability that the wavefunction ends up in state is given by:
The solutions take the form of an eigenvalue problem:
The allowed solutions of the equation, for operator , involve an eigenstate with associated eigenvalue . A measurement on a quantum system can be thought of as driving the wavefunction into an eigenstate defined by the operator; the value of the associated observable is then fixed to be the corresponding eigenvalue. (As noted above, the probability of ending up in a particular eigenstate is regulated by the coefficient of that eigenstate in the original wavefunction decomposition.)
Expectation value
A given operator, e.g. , implies an expectation value of:
If the system is in an eigenstate of the operator:
- Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{alignat}{2} \psi = \sum_n c_n \psi_n = \psi_n }
We know that:
And so:
In other words, the expectation value of an eigenstate is simply the eigenvalue.