|
|
Line 182: |
Line 182: |
| \end{alignat} | | \end{alignat} |
| </math> | | </math> |
− | ====Check====
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | \begin{alignat}{2}
| |
− | \left ( \frac{q}{k} \right )^2 d^{\prime 2}
| |
− | & = \begin{alignat}{2} [ & \left( x \cos \phi_g -\sin \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \right)^2 \\ & + \left( x \sin \phi_g + \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) - d^{\prime} \right)^2 \\ & + \left( d \sin \theta_g + z \cos \theta_g \right)^2 ] \end{alignat} \\
| |
− |
| |
− | & = \begin{alignat}{2} [
| |
− | & x^2 \cos^2 \phi_g - x \cos \phi_g \sin \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) + \sin^2 \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g )^2 \\
| |
− | & + x^2 \sin^2 \phi_g + x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) - d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g \\
| |
− | & + \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g )x \sin \phi_g + \cos^2 \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g )^2 - d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \\
| |
− | & - d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g - d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) + d^{\prime 2} \\
| |
− | & + d^2 \sin^2 \theta_g + 2 d \sin \theta_g z \cos \theta_g + z^2 \cos^2 \theta_g ] \end{alignat} \\
| |
− |
| |
− | & = \begin{alignat}{2} [
| |
− | & x^2 \cos^2 \phi_g - x \cos \phi_g \sin \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) + \sin^2 \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g )^2 \\
| |
− | & + x^2 \sin^2 \phi_g + 2 x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) - 2 d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g \\
| |
− | & + \cos^2 \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g )^2 - 2 d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) + d^{\prime 2} \\
| |
− | & + d^2 \sin^2 \theta_g + 2 d \sin \theta_g z \cos \theta_g + z^2 \cos^2 \theta_g ] \end{alignat} \\
| |
− |
| |
− | & = \begin{alignat}{2} [
| |
− | & x^2 - x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) + ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g )^2 \\
| |
− | & + 2 x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) - 2 d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g \\
| |
− | & - 2 d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) + d^{\prime 2} \\
| |
− | & + d^2 \sin^2 \theta_g + 2 d z \sin \theta_g \cos \theta_g + z^2 \cos^2 \theta_g ] \end{alignat} \\
| |
− |
| |
− | & = \begin{alignat}{2} [
| |
− | & x^2 + d^2 \cos^2 \theta_g - 2 dz \cos \theta_g \sin \theta_g + z^2 \sin^2 \theta_g \\
| |
− | & + ( - x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g + 2 x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g - 2 d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g )( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \\
| |
− | & - 2 d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g \\
| |
− | & + d^{\prime 2} \\
| |
− | & + d^2 \sin^2 \theta_g + 2 d z \sin \theta_g \cos \theta_g + z^2 \cos^2 \theta_g ] \end{alignat} \\
| |
− |
| |
− | & = \begin{alignat}{2} [
| |
− | & d^{\prime 2} + x^2 + d^2 + z^2 - 2 dz \cos \theta_g \sin \theta_g \\
| |
− | & + ( x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g - 2 d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g )( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \\
| |
− | & + 2 d z \sin \theta_g \cos \theta_g - 2 d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g ] \end{alignat} \\
| |
− |
| |
− | & = 2 d^{\prime 2} - 2 d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g + ( x \sin \phi_g \cos \phi_g - 2 d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g )( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \\
| |
− |
| |
− | & = 2 d^{\prime 2} - 2 d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g + ( x \sin \phi_g - 2 d^{\prime} )\cos \phi_g( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \\
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | & = ? \\
| |
− | & = ? \\
| |
− | & = 2 d^{\prime 2} - 2 d^{\prime} x \sin \phi_g + 2 d^{\prime} \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \\
| |
− | & = 2 d^{\prime} \left( d^{\prime} - x \sin \phi_g + \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g ) \right) \\
| |
− | \left( \frac{q}{k} \right)^2
| |
− | & = 2 \left( 1 - \frac{x \sin \phi_g + \cos \phi_g ( d \cos \theta_g - z \sin \theta_g )}{d^{\prime} } \right)
| |
− | \end{alignat}
| |
− | </math>
| |
− |
| |
| =See Also= | | =See Also= |
| * [[Geometry:TSAXS 3D]] | | * [[Geometry:TSAXS 3D]] |
Revision as of 15:25, 13 January 2016
In wide-angle scattering (WAXS), one cannot simply assume that the detector plane is orthogonal to the incident x-ray beam. Converting from detector pixel coordinates to 3D q-vector is not always trivial, and depends on the experimental geometry.
Area Detector on Goniometer Arm
Consider a 2D (area) detector connected to a goniometer arm. The goniometer has a center of rotation at the center of the sample (i.e. the incident beam passes through this center, and scattered rays originate from this point also). Let be the in-plane angle of the goniometer arm (rotation about -axis), and be the elevation angle (rotation away from plane and towards axis).
The final scattering vector depends on:
- : Pixel position on detector (horizontal).
- : Pixel position on detector (vertical).
- : Sample-detector distance.
- : Elevation angle of detector.
- : In-plane angle of detector.
Note that and are defined relative to the direct-beam. That is, for and , the direct beam is at position on the area detector.
Central Point
The point can be thought of in terms of a vector that points from the source-of-scattering (center of goniometer rotation) to the detector:
This vector is then rotated about the -axis by :
And then rotated about the -axis by :
Total scattering
The point on the detector probes the total scattering angle , which is simply the angle between and :
Thus:
Components
The momentum transfer vector is (for elastic scattering):
This vector is of course the surface of the Ewald sphere.
Arbitrary Point
For other points on the detector face, we can combine the above result with the known results for the Geometry of TSAXS. The incident beam is:
For and , we can compute the vector onto the detector face:
This vector is then rotated about the -axis by :
The vector is then rotated about the -axis by :
Components
Where:
Total magnitude
Thus:
See Also