Difference between revisions of "Example:Particle spacing from peak position"

From GISAXS
Jump to: navigation, search
(FCC 111)
(FCC 111)
Line 74: Line 74:
 
\end{alignat}
 
\end{alignat}
 
</math>
 
</math>
 +
 +
===Comparison===
 +
Notice that the BCC 110 and FCC 111 have the same 'conversion factor' from ''q''-position into particle-particle distance. Thus, even without knowing which unit cell the particles are packing into, one can perform the conversion, provided one is confident about the peak being either the BCC 110 or the FCC 111.

Revision as of 13:40, 2 September 2014

Consider the case of trying to measure the particle-particle spacing from the q-value of a particular peak. The interpretation of the q value of course depends upon the packing of the particles; i.e. the unit cell. Consider a cubic unit cell (SC, BCC, FCC). Note that in general:

Since , and since , the realspace spacing of planes is:

BCC 110

Note that for BCC, the particle-particle distance is given by:

So we expect:

Of course, we could also have written:

FCC 111

And:

So:

Or:

Comparison

Notice that the BCC 110 and FCC 111 have the same 'conversion factor' from q-position into particle-particle distance. Thus, even without knowing which unit cell the particles are packing into, one can perform the conversion, provided one is confident about the peak being either the BCC 110 or the FCC 111.