Difference between revisions of "Example:Particle spacing from peak position"

From GISAXS
Jump to: navigation, search
(BCC 110)
(FCC 111)
Line 66: Line 66:
 
</math>
 
</math>
 
Or:
 
Or:
 +
:<math>
 
\begin{alignat}{2}
 
\begin{alignat}{2}
d_{110}
+
d_{111}
   & = \frac{a}{\sqrt{ 2 }} \\
+
   & = \frac{a}{\sqrt{ 3 }} \\
   & = \frac{ 2 d_{nn} / \sqrt{3} }{\sqrt{ 2 }} \\
+
   & = \frac{ 2 d_{nn} / \sqrt{2} }{\sqrt{ 3 }} \\
 
   & = \frac{ 2 d_{nn} }{\sqrt{ 6 }} \\
 
   & = \frac{ 2 d_{nn} }{\sqrt{ 6 }} \\
 
\end{alignat}
 
\end{alignat}
 
</math>
 
</math>

Revision as of 14:38, 2 September 2014

Consider the case of trying to measure the particle-particle spacing from the q-value of a particular peak. The interpretation of the q value of course depends upon the packing of the particles; i.e. the unit cell. Consider a cubic unit cell (SC, BCC, FCC). Note that in general:

Since , and since , the realspace spacing of planes is:

BCC 110

Note that for BCC, the particle-particle distance is given by:

So we expect:

Of course, we could also have written:

FCC 111

And:

So:

Or: