Difference between revisions of "Lattices of nano-objects"

From GISAXS
Jump to: navigation, search
(General models)
(Specific models)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* '''Cylinders''': [http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889804027724 SAXS of self-assembled nanocomposite films with oriented two-dimensional cylinder arrays: an advanced method of evaluation] W. Ruland and B. Smarsly J. Appl. Cryst. (2005). 38, 78-86 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804027724 doi:10.1107/S0021889804027724]
 
* '''Cylinders''': [http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889804027724 SAXS of self-assembled nanocomposite films with oriented two-dimensional cylinder arrays: an advanced method of evaluation] W. Ruland and B. Smarsly J. Appl. Cryst. (2005). 38, 78-86 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804027724 doi:10.1107/S0021889804027724]
 
* '''Spheres''': [http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889807010503 Two-dimensional small-angle X-ray scattering of self-assembled nanocomposite films with oriented arrays of spheres: determination of lattice type, preferred orientation, deformation and imperfection] W. Ruland and B. M. Smarsly J. Appl. Cryst. (2007). 40, 409-417  [http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889807010503 doi:10.1107/S0021889807010503]
 
* '''Spheres''': [http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889807010503 Two-dimensional small-angle X-ray scattering of self-assembled nanocomposite films with oriented arrays of spheres: determination of lattice type, preferred orientation, deformation and imperfection] W. Ruland and B. M. Smarsly J. Appl. Cryst. (2007). 40, 409-417  [http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889807010503 doi:10.1107/S0021889807010503]
* '''Disordered 2D array of spheres''': [http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/5/47/011 Scattering of electromagnetic waves by a disordered two-dimensional array of spheres] N. Stefanou, A. Modinos. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1993, 5, 8859.
+
* '''Disordered 2D array of spheres''': [http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/5/47/011 Scattering of electromagnetic waves by a disordered two-dimensional array of spheres] N. Stefanou, A. Modinos. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1993, 5, 8859. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/5/47/011 doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/5/47/011]
  
 
==General models==
 
==General models==

Revision as of 16:52, 27 August 2015

Sc01.png

Lattices of nanoscale objects are now commonly being generated. Their scattering can be thought of as analogous to atomic crystals. In regular crystals, the atoms form a well-defined unit cell that repeats throughout space to form a lattice. This gives rise to well-defined peaks in reciprocal space. Superlattices can be thought of as the nanoscale analogue: the distance-scales are larger, but again we have objects packing into well-defined symmetry that repeats throughout space. To a first approximation, SAXS data from these systems can thus be interpreted by comparing the peak positions to the known peak patterns for various crystallographic symmetries.

However, quantitative analysis requires more care, since nano-object assembly can be quite different from atomic assembly:

  1. The constituent objects are not atoms (simple point-like scattering objects with generally spherical symmetry). Nanoparticles can have unique shapes, can exhibit polydispersity, etc.
  2. The kinds of disorder that arise in nanoscale systems may be quite different from atomic systems. For example, all atoms are exactly identical, whereas nano-objects exhibit polydispersity in size, shape, orientation, composition, etc. Furthermore, the lattice itself is formed through 'softer' interactions, and may be more disordered than atomic systems (and more tolerant to, e.g., vacancy or substitutional defects).
  3. The symmetries that form from nano-objects may have no atomic examples. Atomic packing is generally extremely 'tight'; the atoms are volume filling and exhibit directional bonding dictated by the local symmetry of bonding orbitals. In nano-systems, very different kinds of interactions may be exploited. Some systems may be simple close-packed; whereas others may be comparatively open and sparse.
  4. There are many nanoscale systems which can be thought of, conceptually, as nano-objects sitting on a lattice, but which are formed in a very different way. For instance, block-copolymers can be modelled as nano-objects on a lattice, but their elementary constituents are in fact the polymer chains (whose individual shape does not readily appear in the scattering signal).


Specific models

A variety of models have been presented to account for specific kinds of arrangements of nano-objects:

General models

Ordered mesoscopic materials model

This paper derives the scattering equations relevant for a variety of mesoscopic morphologies, including lamellae, hexagonally-arranged cylinders, and cubically-packed spheres. These equations are well-suited to describing ordered phases of surfactants, lipids and block-copolymers; as well as packings of colloids or nanoparticles.

Multicomponent lattice of nano-objects model

NanoLattice cartoon.jpg

This paper describes a general model for simulating (and fitting) small-angle scattering data for periodic lattices of nanoparticles. The model is general, allowing for anisotropic nanoparticles (cubes, octahedra, etc.) with prescribed orientations within the lattice. The lattice may also contain a variety of different particles (with different sizes, shapes, or compositions). The model also accounts for various kinds of disorder relevant to nanoscale systems: finite grain size, polydispersity in particle properties (size, shape, orientation), lattice defects (e.g. vacancies), and so on.

SAS of nano-object crystalline assemblies

See Also