Difference between revisions of "Lattices of nano-objects"

From GISAXS
Jump to: navigation, search
(See Also)
(See Also)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
* Discussion of scattering from multiple distinct components in unit cell; see [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/extref/nmat2877-s1.pdf Supplementary Information] of: Petr Cigler, Abigail K. R. Lytton-Jean, Daniel G. Anderson, M. G. and Sung Yong Park [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/abs/nmat2877.html DNA-controlled assembly of a NaTl lattice structure from gold nanoparticles and protein nanoparticles] ''Nature Materials'' '''2010''', ''9'', 918-922 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2877 doi:10.1038/nmat2877]
 
* Discussion of scattering from multiple distinct components in unit cell; see [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/extref/nmat2877-s1.pdf Supplementary Information] of: Petr Cigler, Abigail K. R. Lytton-Jean, Daniel G. Anderson, M. G. and Sung Yong Park [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/abs/nmat2877.html DNA-controlled assembly of a NaTl lattice structure from gold nanoparticles and protein nanoparticles] ''Nature Materials'' '''2010''', ''9'', 918-922 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2877 doi:10.1038/nmat2877]
* Presentation of a essential equations for modeling a lattice with anisotropic nano-objects; see  [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/extref/nmat2870-s1.pdf Supplementary Information] of: Matthew R. Jones, Robert J. Macfarlane, Byeongdu Lee, Jian Zhang, Kaylie L. Young, Andrew J. Senesi, and Chad A. Mirkin [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/full/nmat2870.html DNA-nanoparticle superlattices formed from anisotropic building blocks] ''Nature Materials'' '''2010''', ''9'', 913-917 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2870 doi: 10.1038/nmat2870] See also [[Summary of paper: "DNA-nanoparticle superlattices formed from anisotropic building blocks|summary of mathematics]].
+
* Presentation of a essential equations for modeling a lattice with anisotropic nano-objects; see  [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/extref/nmat2870-s1.pdf Supplementary Information] of: Matthew R. Jones, Robert J. Macfarlane, Byeongdu Lee, Jian Zhang, Kaylie L. Young, Andrew J. Senesi, and Chad A. Mirkin [http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n11/full/nmat2870.html DNA-nanoparticle superlattices formed from anisotropic building blocks] ''Nature Materials'' '''2010''', ''9'', 913-917 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2870 doi: 10.1038/nmat2870] See also [[Paper:DNA-nanoparticle superlattices formed from anisotropic building blocks|summary of mathematics]].

Revision as of 15:00, 15 October 2014

Sc01.png

Lattices of nanoscale objects are now commonly being generated. Their scattering can be thought of as analogous to atomic crystals. In regular crystals, the atoms form a well-defined unit cell that repeats throughout space to form a lattice. This gives rise to well-defined peaks in reciprocal space. Superlattices can be thought of as the nanoscale analogue: the distance-scales are larger, but again we have objects packing into well-defined symmetry that repeats throughout space. To a first approximation, SAXS data from these systems can thus be interpreted by comparing the peak positions to the known peak patterns for various crystallographic symmetries.

However, quantitative analysis requires more care, since nano-object assembly can be quite different from atomic assembly:

  1. The constituent objects are not atoms (simple point-like scattering objects with generally spherical symmetry). Nanoparticles can have unique shapes, can exhibit polydispersity, etc.
  2. The kinds of disorder that arise in nanoscale systems may be quite different from atomic systems. For example, all atoms are exactly identical, whereas nano-objects exhibit polydispersity in size, shape, orientation, composition, etc. Furthermore, the lattice itself is formed through 'softer' interactions, and may be more disordered than atomic systems (and more tolerant to, e.g., vacancy or substitutional defects).
  3. The symmetries that form from nano-objects may have no atomic examples. Atomic packing is generally extremely 'tight'; the atoms are volume filling and exhibit directional bonding dictated by the local symmetry of bonding orbitals. In nano-systems, very different kinds of interactions may be exploited. Some systems may be simple close-packed; whereas others may be comparatively open and sparse.
  4. There are many nanoscale systems which can be thought of, conceptually, as nano-objects sitting on a lattice, but which are formed in a very different way. For instance, block-copolymers can be modelled as nano-objects on a lattice, but their elementary constituents are in fact the polymer chains (whose individual shape does not readily appear in the scattering signal).


Specific models

A variety of models have been presented to account for specific kinds of arrangements of nano-objects:


General models

Multicomponent lattice of nano-objects model

NanoLattice cartoon.jpg

This paper describes a general model for simulating (and fitting) small-angle scattering data for periodic lattices of nanoparticles. The model is general, allowing for anisotropic nanoparticles (cubes, octahedra, etc.) with prescribed orientations within the lattice. The lattice may also contain a variety of different particles (with different sizes, shapes, or compositions). The model also accounts for various kinds of disorder relevant to nanoscale systems: finite grain size, polydispersity in particle properties (size, shape, orientation), lattice defects (e.g. vacancies), and so on.


See Also